
11 August 2025
Handling Goods for Other People. What Could Go Wrong?
When moving or storing goods for your customers, you should have clear terms and conditions and it is imperative customers are made aware of these. These terms protect your own interest and limit your liability to your customers. If they are not made clear to your customers (incorporated), you could end up with a hefty bill that may also not be covered by your insurance policy. Some real-life case studies of this have included:
- The operator who did not incorporate standard terms into the customer contract or even have a proper system in place for incorporation, putting them in breach of a term in their liability insurance. When a substantial claim arose, the operator was obliged to pay the customer in full, and was only able to recover from the insurers the (much lower) weight limitation which would have applied if the terms had been incorporated.
Whatever conditions of carriage or storage you use, it is extremely important that your customer is aware of them. Failure to incorporate could end up with you paying the full claim and, as in the above scenario, only have a limited amount of cover to offset this. It could also lead to insurers avoiding the claim altogether, for breach of the policy terms and conditions.
- The operator who subcontracted a CMR movement to a known and (at the time) trusted regular subcontractor, but without any specific terms agreed to restrict further subcontracting. When the regular subcontractor engaged some further subcontractors, without making any checks on their insurance, and a claim arose, the “trusted” subcontractor relied on CMR Article 37, arguing it was not “the carrier responsible” for the claim, and was able to avoid any liability, leaving the operator the unappealing task of trying to pursue the distant and unfamiliar actual carrier.
- The operator who was not actually a member of the trade association whose standard terms they were trying to trade under. As a result, the operator was not only found by a Court to be unable to rely upon any terms to limit liability at all; when a substantial claim arose, following a warehouse theft, the operator’s liability insurers were also able to decline coverage, leaving the operator to pay the whole claim themselves.
Any questions? Please don’t hesitate to contact one of our team.
simon.horton@ascendbroking.co.uk | Office: 01245 373626

Tags:goods handling
Recent Posts
Ascend Broking
HNW Clients, Don’t Put Yourselves at Risk of Underinsurance!
Ascend Broking
Handling Goods for Other People. What Could Go Wrong?
Ascend Broking